• Stopping off at the ‘Pego and Puppet’ for a quick pint of ‘Monk’s Harvest Fumble’, I sat outside to enjoy the sunshine and make sure of my facts when it came to moaning about the hot weather, now it’s become a national whinge, courtesy of non stop media carpet bombing. Not as much as Brexit but just as tedious.

    The state of my dungarees meant, rather than incite a raft of questions based around ‘did I know what a washing machine was?’ or ‘are you single?’, outside was the best option. I’d not washed them on purpose. Clean fresh dungarees might lead people to believe I was a children’s entertainer which, for many, is a very small step away from ‘kiddie fiddler’. Bouncy, high octane, brightly coloured people bending balloons while waving and gurning at innocent bystanders is clearly quite suspicious.

    It was mostly fresh muck and grease, gained from rolling around under Tracey, my mate Eddie’s most treasured possession, a 1989 Alpha Romeo GTV6. It was also his wife’s name, ensuring he sidestepped any minefields. This often backfired, but not the car or his wife, allegedly.

    A revving engine caught my attention and, with a cloud of long blond hair billowing out of the sunroof, a small blue van pulled into the pub car park not twenty feet from where I sat.

    It was Laura ‘the Sandwich’, a 40 year old-ish lady who put some long hours into her little business. She liked the lads company and was well liked in return: we all often socialised together, apart from Yorkshireman Dick Whatmough, whom she clearly despised. Questionable innuendo was, ironically, not appreciated.

    Laura got out of her van and, clearly pissed off, waved, went inside to reappear minutes later with a very large G & T. She sat down opposite me, and necked about six quid’s worth in one go.

    ‘I’ll be walking home,’ she said, reflectively. ‘Fucking arseholes!’ This had more venom attached, all the more startling coming from such a pretty face.

    ‘Who’s that, Laura?’

    ‘That TV crew down by the river. Filming a scene for a crime drama.’

    ‘You down there flogging sandwiches?’ I inquired.

    ‘Oh no, better than that! The production people came into my shop last week and asked me to do some catering. All very well if a certain arse of a Prima Donna wasn’t being a twat, stopping filming and ruining all the food.’

    ‘Shit, what did she do?’

    ‘It was a he! One of those left wing luvvies with loads of money, full of self importance and media adulation: always finds time to condescend to tell those less well off how to spend their hard earned cash, and what to think!’ She seethed. ‘There’s about twenty of those innocents, aka ‘the crew’, down there now getting fucked over by the idiot.’

    ‘Wow, he’s pissed you off! Was he a Hobbit?’

    ‘What?’ Laura looked puzzled. I shook my head and smiled, and she continued. ‘So after a bit I started chatting to a really nice lady, I think she was in a recent Netflix period drama, the sort of thing the BBC used to do well, but have now got too lost with virtue signalling and rewriting history.’

    ‘I’m guessing she wasn’t pleased with wasting her time?’

    ‘No – she used lots of words that wouldn’t make it pre watershed. She made me laugh though, especially when she showed me this email on her phone. I got her to send it across to me.’ Laughing, Laura handed her phone across.

    This is what I read….


    All Agents/Celebrities currently contemplating an appearance on the show ‘What do we think they are?’ – a slightly tweaked format to accommodate any current gender confusion – should be aware of the following, (a points system is in place).

    You will need to;

    1. Have some background involving the slave trade, preferably not Barbados or Jamaica as the production team fancy somewhere new, St Lucia or Antigua would be good. Any French connection such as Martinique would be very popular. If you are white any involvement in this area, even as indentured workers, would be a non starter. It’s not for white people so you won’t be acceptable.

    2. Have a link into social and industrial hardship in the early 19th to early 20th century. Anecdotes about ‘tut’ mill owner and walking 10 miles in hobnailed clogs for a bread and sawdust roll, or similar, are desirable, the more unbelievable the better – remember ‘4 Yorkshiremen’? Banging on about ‘class‘ – a concept that gained traction in the early 20th century but now is puzzling and meaningless to most in the modern world – is a prerequisite (please bring own cloth cap). Any connections to crumpled, daft, left wing politicians; Michael Foot, Tony Benn, Ken Clarke etc, will be vigorously exploited.

    3. Show how ‘Votes for Women’ impacted positively on your family history. Suffragette plots to murder men of high status resonate well with some ‘wimmin’ in the production team, as do risqué stories of getting trapped in closets – usually with only rugs to munch on – in Parliament after lights out. Prostitutes from Whitechapel are not suffragettes, although potential ‘Jack the Ripper’ angles will be considered as they appeal to the masses. Any opportunity to slip the word ‘patriarchy’ into the narrative multiple times will not be overlooked.

    4. If an ancestor was a member of any single gender organisation or society, perhaps a men’s sports team or scientific body, or a ladies knitting club or amateur theatre group, let us know. We will strongly suggest (make it a ‘fact’!) that they were obviously members of a massive covert LGBT+ network that was part of British society for centuries, and was forcibly suppressed by a very small minority of individuals, who were actually all gay themselves, but were too scared to show their own true rainbow of colours.

    5. Be related to someone who participated in the First World War. Preferably some poor working class boy who was blown to pieces on the Somme with all his pals (we can probably crowbar in ‘exploited by the ruling class’). Died in a mustard gas attack is also going to score highly. If additionally a female relative worked in a munitions factory (being blown to pieces is also good here) then that will practically ensure the appearance money will be heading to your bank account soonest.

    6. Evidence activity involving the ‘Blitz spirit’ during WW2. Contributing to the war effort despite ‘sanctioned‘ racial obstructions is a big points scorer.  Also good are harrowing experiences in concentration camps with low survival rates. ‘Tenko’ type Japanese ones are good right now as we’re trying to avoid the Jewish question. Upsets the Pro Palestinians.

    7. Our focus is very much on the alluring unholy trinity of Racism, Misogyny and Homophobia. Highlighting negative social and cultural environments involving people from the past is very much our bread and butter. The programme prides itself on irreverently ‘outing’ people from historical periods who we feel weren’t showing proper liberal 21st century values, (existing 2 or 3 centuries in the past isn’t an excuse, and pointing out how stupid they were, and how clever we are is an easy win), plus we will be really miffed if we’ve missed an opportunity to bang our drum, however irrelevant. We feel it shows how much we’ve drawn attention to bias, bigotry, and misinformation in journalism. No more making up stories, fabricating evidence or lying is our (new?) clarion call. We will just deny such charges anyway, even when confronted with irrefutable evidence – or failing that, we’ll pretend we can’t hear and ignore everyone.

    Addendum

    ‘Celebrity Fixit Shop’ is due for transmission in the New Year. The second series is already being outlined. The above criteria apply here. It goes without saying that items brought in, along with the back-story will not be checked for veracity. A don’t ask, won’t tell policy is in place. Clearly this is entertainment, therefore the truth can go on the back burner, and eventually be removed from the hob entirely if required. Good TV relies on imagination, and the odd fib here and there.  We request that expenses for any acquired item are not submitted to us as the ‘institutionalised cash handout’ cannot be utilised in such circumstances. That money is needed for our Ideological personal projects, (such as 2019’s bomb ‘A Christmas Carol’), and the Trump court case. Put it on your own tax return.


    I laughed. ‘Always suspected they liked to paint a particular picture.’ Getting up I looked down at her. ‘Another large one for you? Might as well, I’m walking home too, so I’ll be having a pint.’

    ‘Thanks, I think I will,’ she laughed back.

    ‘I can also drop you back in the morning for your van.’

    ‘That’ll be lovely,’ smiled Laura.

    Image and Article Copyright © 2026 by L.C McCarthy

    This is a work of fiction.

  • .

    Define Weapon?

    There I was sat in the ‘Sack and Puppy’, sipping a pint of Witches Nipple, perusing an online discussion pondering the likelihood of the BBC making a programme showcasing Lucy Worsley’s extensive Coat, Handbag and Shoe collection. Advantageously filmed by midgets 18 inches from the floor in order to get, I’m assuming, all the accoutrements in the same frame. Out of focus shots mandatory.

    The attentive followers had adjourned to look at her iplayer back catalogue, and 24hrs later had come back to report there was absolutely no need – there was already enough material to make half a dozen hour long specials. There were also suggestions that a refocus onto apolitical historical content might be nice.

    Three blokes came in, bought pints and sat down at the table next to me. One cocked his head to listen to the background music. It was Pat Benatar’s  ‘Stop Using Sex as a Weapon’.

    The resultant conversation went something like this, with names clarified along the way;

    Chubbs:  Did your other half use sex as a weapon, Munty?

    Munty: I doubt it. Breech loading was a non starter and muzzle loading too far back in the past….

    Chubbs: Sounds like a ‘no’ then. What did the other-half favour as the weapon of choice?

    Munty: Some kind of household implement I’d guess, Chubbs.

    Boz: What? Like a toaster? Smoke, the smell of burning and alarms waking the whole house up screams weaponisation to me.

    Munty: Something traditional perhaps? Rolling pin?

    Boz: Fag in the corner of her mouth and rollers in her hair? Fucking Hell Munty, 1960’s tabloid comic strip! Anyway a rolling pin is rarer and less visible than an Iranian General. How much pastry rolling happens these days?

    Munty: I suppose the other traditional item, the frying pan is also out then: maybe I’ve been single too long. I’m not sure where the rolling pin and frying pan stuff came from. I don’t remember any vicious gory stories involving a wife going ballistic and taking out half a dozen blokes. Going Sutcliffe with a sauté pan doesn’t ring any bells.

    Boz: You’d have seen it on one of those true crime programmes by now. There’s enough of them to have explored every case there’s ever been ten times over. Same sort of TV people have been through every Marvel comic ever published looking for an unexploited character. Surprised we haven’t seen ‘Copyright Man’ yet.

    Munty: Maybe one of those 6 inch high, glossy gold china word things. You know them? They spell ‘LOVE’ or ‘HOME’ and such like. There were puffy wall sticker versions too, as if you’d forget it was your house and need a reminder. They’d hurt broken on your noggin! (He described the ‘things’ shape and size with his hands as he spoke).

    Chubbs: Sounds good. Less of that kind of tat in the world is a step forward. I endured that shit during the horrific crushed silver velour period. My attic is a timeline of tat.  But any heavy ornament would fit that outcome. I was thinking of specific universal things that they’d all use.

    Boz: Do you mean the power of speech?

    Chubbs: No, that’s why Mother Nature invented wireless headphones.  You’re both missing the most obvious weapon, one that has endured and evolved over decades.

    Munty: Are we back on Aunty Pat’s doorstep once more? Full circle? (He pointed upward indicating it was the musical ‘sex’ question originally posed)

    Chubb: Nope. More modern than that. (He paused for effect) I’m talking about the Hoover, or I should say vacuum cleaner.

    Boz: You fucking what? I’m not missing a trick here? You do mean the carpet cleaning thing?

    Munty: It’s not a euphemism only you know? One you’ve just made up?


    Extract from Manual (DFM)…
    *For all those pedants who can’t wait to get their anoraks off and get smug with ‘Apparati’ – Check first! I’m correct.

    Chubb: Nope. That’s exactly what I’m talking about. Think about it. It comes in sizes from small hand held to heavy duty industrial and some barely man portable. Now cordless and very mobile. They obviously have motors designed to hit that frequency level where invasive meets irritating, meets anti social. Wireless headphones are not a defence..

    Munty: Hmm… that kind of utility and effectiveness sounds like a weapon…

    Chubb: What else can bang into doors and walls with such reckless abandon? And after maximum annoyance, as intensity is ramped up until a reaction is forthcoming, objections are robustly defended with the classic  ‘well, somebody has to clean up around here…. – I’m not going to live in a pigsty… – you’re clearly not going to do it…’  et cetera.. Huffing and puffing clearly implied.

    Boz: Now you mention it my mum used her Hoover like some kind of emotional venting system. Saturday morning was a fucking nightmare, especially when you’d only been in bed 4 hours, and were metabolising a dozen pints.. I always wondered how after 30 years of vacuum ‘driving’ she could smash into quite as much of the house as she did. Like Ben Hur’s fucking chariot!

    Chubb: Be aware that the vacuum’s rubber bumpers aren’t to protect the furniture. They’re to increase weapon capability. The rollers and suchlike underneath intensify the noise, and are there to intimidate, a bit like the sound of grinding tank tracks puts the shits up your average trench bound squaddie.

    Munty: My sister’s got a Kirby. It’s the Leopard 2 of the vacuum world. Metal bodied with a separate drive motor. She doesn’t have to go around the house, just hoovers upstairs and the whole floor vibrates. You’d think a sinkhole was opening up below.

    Chubb: The vacuum’s won anti-social, and passive-agressive, household appliance of the year awards 38 times in a row. The hairdryer didn’t stand a chance, and that’s consistently come second. That’s invasive, makes the telly unwatchable but most have a cable and malevolently drying your hair all over the house is difficult to justify. The vacuum is ‘access all areas’ and impossible to counter unless you like being called lazy and dirty, and immediately losing the moral high ground.

    Boz: But I’m not complaining about the cleaning stuff – it’s the timing. I complained once and got, ‘I don’t care if it is the World Cup Final, and its only once every four years, I’m not living in squalor’. Thing is the week before I’d got the drill out – after work, to put the shelf up she’d asked for – and I got a gob full.  ‘Coronation Street’ took priority – and it was a repeat!

    Munty: Yeh! Now I think about it was my ex’s catalyst for ‘teddies out the pram’ on more than one occasion.  It’s some kind of proxy weapon. Less about dusty, more about a platform for opening hostilities.

    Chubb: Dirty tricks and a dust up! Ha-ha! Told you it was a weapon.

    Boz:  Crikey, we’ll be sending Mr Dyson to the Hague on war crimes charges next! What’s the solution?

    Chubb: Do some hoovering using the same reasoning as inflicted on you. I was told it wasn’t up to scratch, and it got re-done.  I claimed I was trying my best and just wanted to help out. Advantage Chubb. I also popped the fuse out on certain days, but don’t kick the arse out of that one. I was asked nicely not to ‘help out’ during her programmes, and I was given the same return deal. Doesn’t solve the proxy weap ……

    At this point two women came into the pub, weighed down with shopping bags and made their way across to the three men.

    One of them, a blonde in leggings, addressed Chubb: Hey love, Me and Maria have picked up a few nice bits.

    Chubb:  Sounds nice, Kath.  (His face did not match his words – without even knowing what she’d bought – and he was clearly working out how much room he had in the attic.)

    Maria (looking at Boz): I won’t show you here, but I’ve bought some lovely ornaments, and they’re really on trend right now!

    Boz grinned, although it looked more a grimace of pain, and nodded. (‘On trend’ has that effect on many people.)

    Kath:  And we’ve been looking* at new hoovers, Maria fancies a new one, and I know ours has been playing up, so you won’t have to fiddle about fixing it anymore, Dave (Chubb).

    From where I sat I felt the lads in question die a little inside.

    Munty (laughing): Hey Guys, Upgrades!

    (* Girltalk for – I’ve picked my favourite, ordered it, paid up and it’ll be here a week on Monday.)

    Images (bar those in the public domain) and Article Copyright © 2026 by L.C McCarthy

    This is a work of fiction.

  • I was in the pub (for a change?) getting outside a pint of ‘Tarts Temple’ when I clocked ‘Circular’ Chris at the bar. He was showing off his suntan, which was more like an intense crimson with his pale skin and Titian locks. You’ll probably find the shade on one of the paint companies colour charts under Scottish Tan.

    He got his name, not from his body shape, or even when he worked for the post office, but from his head. I suppose ‘Moony’ or something planetary related would have fitted and he was called ‘Tefal’ -i.e. a frying pan – for a while, but they’re also known for other kitchen stuff, and it just wasn’t right. Panface was suggested but it didn’t alliterate, which is very desirable in British humour, and was far too direct. That kind of comedy is best left to the Germans.

    ‘Alright Circy (Surky), been on holiday?’

    Turned out he’d been to the Maldives, all inclusive with his other half.

    ‘Yeh, Saved up a hod of money this year. Sally hasn’t spent much either, so as a reward….’

    ‘You’ve been out and about though? I’ve seen you and Sal in here loads of times.’

    ‘Ah. Got your phone handy? I’ll show you why.’ Pulling his own phone out he sent me the email he’d sent to Evri….

    ‘So Circy , they won’t deliver to you?

    ‘I get made up delivery attempt emails but that’s just mugging their system off.’

    ‘It pisses you off though?’

    ‘No,’ he laughed. ‘Thing is I can still get whatever I want as other companies are actually exploiting the situation. So I ordered something the other day, and under the ‘special delivery’ and ‘express courier’ free options, which are secret codenames for Evri – which also tells a story, mugging people off, although only one time, hopefully – was a DPD option for a couple of quid extra. Well worth it, no worries, no gamble whether it comes or not, proper updates rather than half-assed disappearing trails, and above all respect for the customer.’

    ‘Bit pointless though, sending that letter. Their customer service, and I use that term very loosely, will just dismiss you’

    ‘Yep, Of course they will. But it made me laugh. Fancy a pint?’

    Images (bar those in the public domain) and Article Copyright © 2026 by L.C McCarthy

    This is a work of fiction.

  • I was mulling over what the cast would have been if my novel Dmitry’s Gift had been turned into a ‘Carry On’. For the 8 and a half people who have read it (one person claims to, but I’m doubtful) it’ll perhaps be more thought provoking than for those who haven’t – who will be doubtless saying ‘WTF are you going on about?’

                                                      Carry On Dmitry

    Sasha – Jim Dale

    Dmitry – Leslie Philips

    Buralov – Terry Scott

    Kurilov – Peter Gilmore

    Andrei – Jon Pertwee

    Mischa – Bernard Bresslaw

    Kochansky – Charles Hawtrey

    Lev – Kenneth Connor

    Boris – Jack Douglas

    Yefim – Wilfrid Brambell

    Laundress – Hattie Jacques

    Nelly – Fenella Fielding

    Malenkov – Bert Kwouk

    Auntie – Joan Sims

    Tima Chelkin – Bernard Cribbins

    Darya (Dasha) – Patsy Rowlands

    Krugyin – Kenneth Williams

    Sharapov – Peter Butterworth

    Fedor – Sid James

    Hetta – Barbara Windsor

    Simeon – Kenneth Cope

    There’s a few more characters – Sasha’s Grandad (Stanley Unwin?) for example, and as his lady love, June Whitfield – but it’s a start!

    Although I don’t watch ‘soap operas’ I’m aware of some of the cultural icons who have ‘graced the cobbles’ of Coronation Street. Ken Barlow as Kochansky: Reg and Curly would be Krugyin and Sharapov…….Maybe Rita as Auntie and Jack and Vera playing Tima and Dasha. Another thread to explore…..

    If you’d like to ponder your own suggestions you’ll need to read the book first. See what I did there?

  • On a recent sightseeing tour of a town in middle England I stopped off for a pint close to the red brick university that carries that town’s name but very little else of note – apart from a very high pass rate for Media Studies. The tavern – ‘The Frog and Pessary’ – used to be a care home for elderly ladies facilitated by a former French Statesman. This form of charity is still an ongoing tradition, apparently.

    While savouring an aromatic glass of ‘Strumpet’s Fundament’ I spied a dishevelled mumbling elderly gentleman frantically going over some papers in the corner. My immediate thought was he was gamely struggling with an enormous workload. However, spotting his University ID, I chuckled heartily and promptly dispelled such a foolish notion. Noting the stale beer smell creeping, miasma like, from his decrepit tweed jacket, pro Palestine badge and the worn soles hanging off his ancient suede shoes, I studied his bearded face expecting to identify one of the increasingly rare Corbyn acolytes. Before I could confirm or deny this he angrily tossed a balled up document onto the floor, knocked his drink back  and stomped out.

    A member of staff came by picked up the paper ball, and placed it on my table. Cheek!

     However, as it was now public property I snatched the opportunity and read it. And now I share it with you….

    Merit, like experience, is always disparaged by those who don’t have any.

    Images and Article Copyright © 2026 by L.C McCarthy

    This is a work of fiction.

  • I met a bloke, Nick, in the pub a while back – big beard, big personality, drinking gallons of beer – no, it wasn’t Brian Blessed – but he did seem familiar. Just moved here from Sweden as he didn’t care for how they utilised public money. He’s now having a rethink after viewing Scotland’s public debt and Reeves ‘vindictive clusterfuck’ (his words) of last week. He’s moving on in the New Year. He’s considering Greenland but isn’t sure who owns it.

    He sent me this – thought it was weird. Asked me what he should do. I said don’t bother. You might as well give Reeves a ‘Calculator’ for Christmas as Rachel’s own is clearly in error – What’s his name again? Tarquin? No, that’s not right…

    Clearly a lot of it is well above my pay grade. Personally, I had him down for a VR headset (great for blotting out genuine reality), or one of the Powderpuff dolls (Angela -the ginger one?). Or is it a Bratz..?

    Difficult to tell….

    Images (bar those in the public domain) and Article Copyright © 2025 by L.C McCarthy

    This is a work of fiction.

  • 04 Aug 2025

    Reflection – Those who spend all their time in their own heads rarely see what’s going on in anyone else’s.

    Christmas already -WTF!

    There was some talk today about Christmas. It was on the radio, and somebody was going on about whether it was appropriate or not – timing wise. For most people ‘not’, if those I speak to are anything to go by.

    However, there are those who, looking to shift something off the back of the Christmas vehicle, know there must be muppets out there who are already hugging themselves and bouncing around like five year olds – apologies to the normally adjusted children who are saving the histrionics until December – despite the fact that their sun tan lotion is barely dry.

    These will also be the people who buy innappropriate gifts – a pet hate of mine. These people treat the giving of gifts – don’t say ‘gifting’, I’ll probably vomit – as some kind of obligatory box ticking exercise.

    There are three categories of gift giver;

    • 1. The gift where the buyer choses something they would like while completely ignoring the person on the receiving end. It may appeal to their sense of humour, excused with practicality, like Gnome Boxers or Reindeer slippers. (How I do hate novelty gifts!). In years to come many such items – Ronco, K-Tel etc – for removing fluff fron Gran’s cardy, rebuttoning said cardy with plastic rivets or chopping up the few vegetables her pension allows her – become collectable for people who like to laugh at junk like that. Alternately they might just be cheap.
    • 2. Next comes the impressionable buyer who, while not immune from the items at 1. above, prefaces presentaion of their gift with the words ‘the sales lady in the shop said…’ or ‘they are really on trend right now’.. (another sick bag please -this one is full), or ‘my neighbour’s got one, and they have a Range Rover!..’ They often distrust themselves so much they are scared of getting it wrong, or are just pointing out, via the gift choice, how very avant guard they are. They’ll probably use that phrase as it sounds pretentious enough…..errr?
    • 3. Lastly, my favourite person. The one that actually takes an interest in you, and knows what you’re about and reflects that in your gift. That really does mean something. Perhaps noticing you spend time outdoors or reading books. Maybe you like cooking or collecting bobbleheads, things they may not like, but know the gift is not for them, but you. Friendship (not the concept peddled on Facebook), like it’s sibling ‘Love’, means not putting ‘you’ first, that’s what your real friends do. It’s not about fashion or cost, it’s about care.

    “Fashion is something barbarous, for it produces innovation without reason and imitation without benefit” – George Santayana

    In a couple of years it seems that after Easter stock is cleared from the shelves they’ll soon be filling the space with blow up santa’s and cheap jumpers with smutty Elves emblazoned across the front. You know it’s coming!


    31 Jul 2025

    Reflection – ‘Insecurity is a disease, it kills everything bar selfishness..‘.

    A little knowledge is an embarrassing thing

    I was reading some comments online recently criticising the film (I’m English) Child 44, set in 1950’s soviet russia. It’s not too bad – Gary Oldman, Tom Hardy – What’s not to like!

    Anyway, this individual was claiming it wasn’t credible because none of the ‘Uniforms’ were wearing medals at all times, because that’s what they did – on operations and in combat!

    What a plonker!

    Why? For a number of reasons;

    Photographs portraying soldiers wearing field uniforms showing off their medals are numerous. However, these are all official propaganda snaps – taken in the field. Nobody owned/used a camera. The Soviet Union was notoriously poor at providing consumer goods. A pair of shoes were like rocking horse shit, ones that didn’t fall apart even rarer. Secondly, buying food was the priority then, even if you had an option. Lastly, the Secret Police were not fans of amateur photography and it was dangerous to one’s health to go waving a camera around. The point being official ‘Courageous Peasant Soldiers’ snaps only – anything impromtu, unstaged or spontaneous was not possible.

    Soviet soldiers did not own ‘Best Uniforms’ – just ones for fighting in. The idea of supplying 70 million troops with Imperialist inspired best dress, instead of more tanks, was a non starter. Therefore to conflate field uniforms and medals as being worn together in the field is mistaken. What else were they going to hang their medals on for Pravda photos? Pyjamas! Although these were rarer than shoes.

    Perhaps more importantly this concept would be incredibly unpopular. Anyone daft enough to wear all that glittery metal in the field would be Billy No-mates. It would attract enemy fire like flies to a turd, which ironically would be what his colleagues would be calling him. It’s a complete non-starter. Nothing screws a surprise attack up like a load of blokes jangling across the battlefield lit up like a capitalist Christmas tree. What commander would condone that!

    How some people look at a few bits of ‘info’ – fail to ask common sense questions or find corroborating facts – and throw themselves into the arena, subsequently complaining that a lion bit them, astounds me. Making yourself look like a idiot, then saying you didn’t know better, only makes it worse.

    It’s ignorance in this case.


    27 Jul 2025

    Drama? – What Drama?

    Why does much of the UK drama on TV seem to consist of? ;

    • Everything shot with a grey or blue filter. No uplifting sunshine to be seen.
    • Everybody is confrontational – not just the antagonist, all the good guys too!
    • Incredibly stroppy junior staff members who can’t see the bigger picture. Very stereotypical.
    • Interdepartmental rudeness/tardy co-operation when everyone has the same goal. Really? – No!
    • Hierachy who pester and threaten top staff members beneath them. Very inspiring for juniors.
    • Public servants who are blatantly rude and beligerent toward members of the public. Rung the council lately?

    Is this really ‘Drama’? What a depressing crappy world we apparently live in. In some ways it is, but have we forgotten good stuff happens too? Talk about mental heath issues!

    These mythical scenarios only occur rarely. Ninety nine percent of professionals; Police, Fire, Health Services, Legal, Financial… etc cultivate good, happy and respectful working environments because they produce the best results for all concerned, not the dysfunctional small minded tyrannies portrayed. Obviously some upset occurs but good communication resolves it quickly. It has to, as moving forward is paramount. However, what we get is cheap and crude ‘Drama’ most of which is soon forgotten. Like a sensationalist tabloid headline. Is this the best such a large talent pool can produce?

    I can hear the gainsayers now -It’s only pretend, people know it’s not real life. Bollocks! I’ve lost count of the number of actors who have been abused online and in the street because of the character they portray on TV. There are people who emulate and stalk others as they aspire to be just like the person they portray. Numerous contestants on game shows cite the likes of ‘The Crown’ as the source of knowledge, despite the producers admitting large chunks are made up. Many online tabloids mix real life storylines with plotlines from soap operas or reality tv on the same page. Clearly many cannot tell fact from fiction, reality from pretend. Often that divide is consciously, perhaps deliberately obscured.

    I would have thought quality drama should be getting more sophisticated rather than plumbing the depths of vulgarity. There is only a finite number of plot lines, but people love a good story even if they’ve seen it many times. I know people who have watched; Zulu, Star Wars, Pride and Prejudice (BBC), Friends, assorted Dickens and many others scores of times, but still settle on the sofa with a smile on their face when a favourite pops up on screen.

    There is no substitute for a good story, credible characters/acting talent, and a well thought through and executed script.

    So, come on main channels step your game up and give us some quality drama. Don’t drag us all down – Lift us all up. We deserve it.