• On the Bus, Off the Bus….

    (Here we are again back in Lee’s Land of the Metaphorical….)

    The lone woman had been waiting sometime. Tapping her foot impatiently, as if the contact with the tarmac would help to dissipate her frustration, she sought an outlet to keep her annoyance from showing.

    So desperately did she want to stay calm that the knowledge that she was clearly being disrespected was tearing her into pieces. Warnings had been given and wisely noted as it seemed historically prudent. Although she had walked many of the same corridors as those advisers this recent promotion was the first of its kind she hoped to experience, and she needed to remain level headed.

    Therefore poor treatment was only to be expected and endured, although she hoped the greater good and success of the department were uppermost in everyone’s mind.

    The grey sky seemed oppressive and turned pitiless as a drizzle began to fall

    Minutes later she sensed rather than saw the large twin decked vehicle that slid alongside her isolated position, glancing up as it came to a halt. The door hissed open and a smiling face came into view.

    “I hope you have not been waiting too long.” It seemed more of a statement than a question as if any response would be irrelevant. Perhaps the ‘not’ should have been omitted.

    The woman said nothing and stepped aboard the bus. From outside, apart from the light emitting from the doorway, nothing could be seen of the internal activity or what was situated within.

    “Welcome aboard. I’m William. I’ll be conducting you along this little journey of ours.”

    “Excellent. Where are we going right now? What’s our first obstacle?”

    “Why don’t I just show you your place. Get you orientated.” Again more of a instruction than a question.

    “Who’s driving?” The woman asked looking toward the front of the vehicle where she could see a small blacked off capsule. There was no screen to look through and she could not see where the bus was going as it smoothly pulled away.

    “Perhaps we could get you settled first”, smiled William.

    Despite acquiescing she mentally committed to getting answers for all of her questions. Turning on her heel, so as to face the direction William indicated with his outstretched arm, she examined her future domain.

    A walkway extended down the centre of the vehicle leading to a single door in an enclosed area at the rear. There were surprisingly few seats down each side. Each of the dozen seats was a double and both places were occupied, the occupants intently studying their areas of responsibility. The windows were quite small, and impossible to see out of unless one was sat very close. Some were more obscured than others, and the viewers looked through very small patches which they periodically cleared in order to see just enough to meet their requirements, their partner closest to the aisle tapped at a small keyboard clearly linked to an equally small screen.

    “And what do these people all do, William?”

    “Oh, they just deal with the day to day running of the department,” he replied as he attempted to shepherd her towards the rear.

    “Such as? I’d like to see what the department staff do everyday.”

    “No need to worry about them. They’ll get on with what’s needed. If they want anything I’ll see to them and let you know as necessary. I wouldn’t want to waste your precious time.”

    She turned to the nearest person on her right. A small man dressed in a grey suit in his late thirties. Printed above his head on a sign was his section, an incomprehensible collection of letters and numbers she could not yet decipher. “How is your day going?”

    It took him a few moments to realise he was being addressed directly. Slowly turning and looking up at her he had a distinct ‘rabbit caught in the headlights’ expression. Looking at her his mouth moved silently a few times before he looked puzzlingly across at William.

    “He’s a little distracted at the moment,” smirked her escort. “Let’s get you started on the important matters. They’ve quite built up you know!”

    “What if I need to speak to any of these sections?”

    “I’ll take care of that, or one of my deputies. If you do need to speak directly with a member of staff we’ll arrange that one of the individuals in the aisle is made available.”

    “And the staff by the windows?”

    “Not directly. That would be through his section head. A lot of what they deal with is of a specialist nature,” beamed William patronisingly, “the section head would be able, through me or my deputy, to put it in layman’s terms.”

    “So you’re saying I cannot communicate with my staff?”

    “Off course you can,” assured William in a slightly whining voice, “but it’s always easier if they’re not distracted too much or put under too much pressure. We don’t want them feeling stressed and making accusations of bullying or harassment now do we?”

    “Emanating from asking basic questions or exchanging niceties?” She frowned.

    “Well,” he shrugged his shoulders and turned up his palms in an expression of helplessness, “sadly it’s a strange world we live in.” He looked knowingly at her in expectation of some sage agreement, perhaps a downcast look or some sad slow head-shaking to acknowledge the inevitability of the situation. None was forthcoming.

    “Well, I find that people who communicate are happier in the workplace.”

    “I expect it must be the nature of the job.” Whether it was her, or the staff, he was alluding too wasn’t clear. “Shall we have a look at what you have waiting?”

    Reflecting later she realised his words were chosen to indicate a situation of urgency which didn’t exist. All designed to move things along and prevent further questions. For now she followed him through the door at the far end. They went up a set of stairs to the upper deck.

    A pair of desks sat in the first section belonging to William’s ever hovering pair of deputies who it seemed might implode if they strayed further than a few feet from their Master. The next section was for William and and a secretary who seemed long on curt belligerence, and short on warm personality. Next came the Minister’s office.

    It was a lovely office. Clean and bright with a tidy desk occupied by a single telephone and surrounded by comfortable chairs. There were no windows. She could not see out nor could anyone see in.

    There were three large screens, one on each side and one directly to the front. There was a door next to this one. She turned to William, pointing with a finger and her mouth began to open.

    “The screens can show any matters, or input, you require to fulfil your role. You let me know what you need and it will be provided,” Pre-empted William. “The door leads up to your speaking platform.”

    “I can’t see out.” She turned to look at her companion.

    “Yes. That’s right.” He smiled back at her. As her own unsmiling gaze did not falter he felt further explanation might be needed. “Security.” That also seemed insufficient to her, but clearly considered ample enough to close her down. “We’ve had problems with the staff in the past leaking information,” and looking around conspiratorially he added, “outside.”

    “But they can’t even communicate with me let alone foreign powers or terrorist groups!”

    “We have to be strict on this subject, so we’re forced into running a very tight ship. We’d love to be more open but……”. William trailed off. Again he was looking for agreement for his convenient myth.

    “I expect that means no leaks to the press or whistleblowing then?” She smiled back at him, a smile that held as little conviction as his own.

    “Well, we usually try to rise above all the political wrangling. A ‘bun fight’ is most demeaning,” he added pompously.

    “A bun fight! This is politics, an exchange of views,” she exclaimed, “a fundamental part of Democracy.”

    “You’ll understand we like to steer clear of politics. We have to be seen as apolitical.”

    “I think what you mean is I’m not required, an unnecessary encumbrance, a inconvenient complication.” Her soft measured tone and arched brow indicated displeasure.

    “No, Minister”, he assured her smugly, “You are the interface between the public and the Ministry.”

    “It sounds more like I work for you as some kind of public relations spokesperson.” She smoothed down her skirt, the activity covering her rising anger. “And here’s me thinking that you were here to implement our parties policy and, by implication, our promises to the electorate.”

    “So we are, to the best of our ability and limitations. Often we have our hands tied by previous events and decisions made by your predecessors.” The smarmy smile returned.

    “The question is are you going to be proactive and brief me on any pitfalls, or just watch me trip over hidden obstacles?”

    “Minister, If you’ll allow me I’d be delighted to guide you along a safe path. I can’t be held responsible for any decisions made if I am unaware of the direction you intend taking.”

    “I’m sure you’d love to guide me along a safe path. I’d like to avoid any cliff edges where a momentary lapse on your part might prove damaging,” before he could respond she continued ,”and with that in mind I believe the Rowkin report may be imminent? I’d like a brief on that soonest”.


    Rowkin Tenby report – Investigation into funding for a new software system* that didn’t actually work but irredeemable and exorbitant amounts of cash had already been spent, and it had been proposed that ‘teething’ difficulties could be ‘ironed out’ in use. This classic get out of jail free card enabled all undisguisable failure to be minimised to ‘acceptable setbacks’. The cost – also well beyond original financial projections – to the public in lost time, pointless incomprehensible staff training, non existent after sales service, unprocessed documentation, false claims, legal action, credibility, and the eventual inevitable replacement with another ‘pin the tail on the donkey’ type solution was immense. The latter could not take place before an acceptable period of time had passed. This was deemed as the amount of time taken for anyone who could be held responsible to; A. Retire on a fat pension and thereby be financially obligated to ensure anyone still in post was not incriminated, and B. ensure they could reasonably be believed when claiming they ‘couldn’t remember details’ – ‘it was very busy then, things were confused’ – ‘wasn’t sure who had oversight on that particular project’ etc.

    *The private software company ‘Fagitasumo’ had held a party in Ayia Napa when they were awarded the contract. Massive bonuses were handed out across the board before work even began (that ‘work’ would consist of modifying a previous software package designed for a completely unrelated business/system/requirement, that also hadn’t worked – but attempting to recoup ‘something’ was seen as sound economics). ‘Let the public money floodgates open!’, a rather tipsy debagged director had allegedly cheered from atop a table as the weekend long party got into full swing.


    “I’ll get something put together in the next couple of weeks,” William bowed his head.

    “No. I’ll need to address the press on the issue, pronto. Getting information out promptly will prevent other players gaining the advantage. I don’t want to just contradict everything they’ve said. I’d rather the opposition only have a reactive option”.

    “I’m not sure I’ll be able to address every unsubstantiated matter in such a short time. I don’t want you to not have all the correct answers.”

    “Do we have any areas that are looking shaky? Anything that’s likely to bite us on the ars… backside? Those are the areas I need to address now. Any stuff that’s just rumour we can close down, and look at later.”

    “I believe we are fine on all the matters out in public view. As I say there are unsubstantiated matters floating around, but nothing solid that can trip you up.”

    It became the priority topic for the next few days. Getting something out to the media, and gaining the initiative was something her Party were quite poor at and she was determined to gain the upper hand. However, matters were taken out of her hands all too soon.

    “Ahh Minister?” breathed William as he peeked around the door at her. “We need to address the media.”

    “Yes. Tomorrow morning sounds good to me.”

    “I’m afraid it’ll have to be now. The media procession have overtaken us and are now encamped in our pathway. They have become unavoidable. We’ll have to satisfy their hunger before moving forward.”

    He moved forward followed by his two acolytes who were busy nodding and smiling, which seemed to be their only major talents. He opened the door leading up to the public platform.

    Her eyebrows arched. “So, you can confirm everything is in order? We have nothing that’s going to jump out and bite us?”

    “I believe you have everything you will need, Minister,” William bombastically confirmed.

    “Okay, let’s get this done,” she stood up and sighed, unhappy that this spectacle was not at her behest. Being railroaded by the press was not desirable, and a small voice inside was asking ‘why now?’ What has prompted this event?

    Laying her notes on the lectern, she adjusted the microphone and examined her audience below. A number of vehicles lay strewn across the Bus’s path. Abandoned in haste and signifying the rush to ensure a prime spot amongst the assembled horde that now bayed up at her like a pack of rabid dogs. She couldn’t hear what was being asked and raised her hands for silence. She turned back momentarily to see the three men stood behind her and rolled her eyes. Smiles of empathy were returned. They were right behind her.

    “Ladies and Gentlemen of the press I am going to make a short statement on the current situation regarding the Rowkin Tenby report. I will take questions immediately afterwards.”

    Five minutes later she finished and, gathering her papers together, prepared to answer the few inconsequential questions that would arise, as most of the main points had been soundly dealt with in her statement.

    “Yes, Alison.” She pointed to a woman from one of the more reputable newspapers.

    “Minister, can you expand on the comments made in the email leaked from your department concerning the extra money…..”

    Extra money? What the fuck was the woman talking about? And why are they all waving pieces of paper at me? Bloody Hell! Do they all have the same leaked email? Who the fuck had leaked information that wasn’t even on her radar?

    All these questions went through her head like an express train that wasn’t stopping, and if one were stood to close would suck you up and take you with it.

    Her stunned silence prompted another of the horde to shout, “Are you going to deny this misappropriation of public funds?”

    Yet another bawled, “Does this mean your resignation, Minister?”

    She turned around in puzzled astonishment to be met with… nothing. There was nobody there. The three ‘supporting staff’ had vanished into thin air, as if they’d never existed.

    As she turned back she felt her feet shift from under her. The railing in front of her had slid away and she fell forward. Her flight path took her down the front of the vehicle to be deposited in a heap on the road beneath. The bus slid over her smoothly and, apart from a lot of hot air and a gentle caress, she emerged at it’s rear physically unscathed. It was over in seconds.

    Sitting up she looked around. It seemed like she’d been dumped into a wilderness. Standing up, she smoothed her clothes, brushing off any lingering debris, and searched for a suitable pathway. The bus had disappeared from sight and there was no clear indication to the way ahead. The media wolf pack, their hunger satisfied, had broken up and were now back in their newsrooms licking her blood off their chops.

    Taking out her phone she looked at the screen. Nothing. She messaged a few of her allies and waited. Nothing. Trying the PM’s office, she waited once more. No answer. She sighed and smiled to herself.

    The only way forward seemed to be following in the wake of the bus and see what could be salvaged. Perhaps there would be a major car crash and vindication could follow. It might be that she would find an opportunity to ask a question or two that caused the bus to reconsider it’s direction. Or provide a platform for others to do so.

    Maybe she’d come upon the next ‘lamb to the slaughter’ waiting patiently at the designated pick up point. They’d be constantly checking the time, and their frustration would be mounting. She grinned once more in recollection, and thought that it might be nice to spend more time in the constituency directly serving her voters rather than some bureaucratic nonsense. Fulfilment takes many forms.

    She whistled as she walked…

    Images and Article Copyright © 2026 by L.C McCarthy

  • There’s a few little matters that are swimming around my head right now. Individually, a little too brief to deserve a whole post to themselves. Anyone who writes knows a good clearout is like weeding the garden – new growth can come through when you are no longer distracted by now excised items that were showing little sign of further growth, and obscuring fresh progress. You know I like a metaphor.

    Above is, allegedly, according to an unverifiable source, a proposed campaign image for a mental health charity. An upsurge in cases citing this as an appalling and gratuitous symbol of banality prompted action. As responses ranged from making sufferers ‘feel nauseous’ to others ‘looking up train timetables’, it was decided the nausea pathway was more publicly palatable.*

    (*this sensitivity was due to the kerfuffle raised when certain animal charities broke the morality barrier by mailshoting images of emaciated and clearly demised ‘pets’*, or if you want to be grandiose ‘animal companions’. The public were unhappy when breakfasting infants collecting the post off the doormat were traumatised, becoming tearful, grieving and permanently scarred, so the ‘tactic’ was stopped. The perpetrators remained puzzled as they were adamant that ‘clearly the end justified the means’.)

    *Our nation of animal lovers clearly get confused with ‘pet’ and ‘victim’.


    Why are Electric cars so ugly?

    A lot of ‘EV’s’ look like cars kids have drawn. Not surprising when Postman Pat’s van is fairly high profile for under 6’s, but I’m guessing (hoping) vehicle designers are not big Cbeebies viewers. The Japanese used to design a lot of stuff like that, probably still do, but it’s never been that popular anywhere else. Many look purpose built for users who may be less physically capable.

    Point being, why? I know there are batteries and weight distribution (technical factors) to consider but there’s still room to have some nice aesthetics and a little flair. There can only be one conclusion. It’s being done on purpose.

    It’s designed to show committent to matters environmental. In other words owners have transcended the crass eye pleasing materialistic marketing normally ascribed to the car industry. This rejection clearly defines their green credentials. You no longer care what people think about what you drive because you care more for the planet. It might remind people of duck egg blue and fibreglass*, but you’ve risen above that and can now look down smugly upon them – having paid a hugely inflated price to do so – and say, ‘I’m doing my bit! What about you?’

    You will have a lot of time to reflect on your personal sacrifice as you sit charging for 6 hours in the services – in your mobile** sanctimonious virtue gesture (car) – trying to eke out the £8 vegan cheese sandwich you just bought to add some further justification to your stop – and wishing you’d swallowed your outrage and paid the shameless profiteering fee for fast charging.

    *a bit of online interrogation will be needed for some on this, particularly if you are under 40. Possibly you’ll thank me for enlarging your knowledge database, but that’s doubtful.

    **when finally charged – lucky you weren’t in a hurry!



    Is there a word for some types?

    Maybe it’s my ignorance, I don’t spend enough (insert ‘any’) time on social media getting the gen/gen. But surely there’s a word for those people who always correct you for perceived transgressions or contradictions to ‘accepted’ (media driven) social conventions. For example when I was speaking to a nurse at the hospital a while back;

    Nurse: We have a right problem with kids running about on the ward. The parents won’t be told and it’s not fair on the other patients. Little buggers!

    Me: You should have a naughty cupboard. Lock them in there, they can fight it out amongst themselves. Maybe supply a weapon or two for the entertainment value?

    As we chuckled at the clearly silly scenario a voice piped up from about 20 feet away. It was a male nurse who wasn’t part of the conversation, nor likely to be.

    He: You’re not allowed to say things like that. If the Social Services heard you there would be a lot of trouble for you.

    Most humans would think he was going to start laughing momentarily. We waited – nothing. He was serious. At this point, as a retort wandered into my mind, I was reminded of one of my favourite Mark Twain quotes;

    Never argue with an Idiot, they’ll drag you down to their level and beat you with experience.

    The point being, if common sense and a sense of humour had failed to embed itself in 35+ years, a witticism from me was unlikely to cause an epiphany. It would be a frustrating waste of time to bother replying. The nurse looked at me and rolled her eyes. We both moved away. She later remarked that she didn’t know him and was a little pissed that he felt that his PC ‘advice’ authorised listening to, and taking part in someone else’s conversation. Sadly, it seems he is not alone nowadays. Probably a member of one of the Unions for the self entitled, the ones with supposedly punchy single word titles, much loved by the left as it may be a verb or just imply activity. This is often a myth and forward momentum and change is often what members reject most strongly. Do not suggest ‘Luddite’.

    Yes, there are general terms we can use for people like this, many prefixed with the ‘F’ word – one wonders what a group of these would be like to spend time with, Eeek! – but is there a specific term that can be used? If there is it can’t be well known. A collective noun would be great for the group. Perhaps a ‘Fester’?

    Another one that should have a specific descriptor is the woman you often meet while picking kids up at school, or she’s part of an older social group – perhaps one of your mum’s friends: wears a lot of animal print outfits and celebrity fragrances. She’ll always be a ‘Nan’ not a ‘Granny’, although she’ll be less goat, more mutton. Thing is she’ll prattle on, bragging incessantly, about her 11 year old grandson and how he’s definitely going to become a premier league footballer as he goes training on a Tuesday night, and somebody or other said he was good. Unlikely, as his chubby frame’s (although adorned in branded gear, 24/7) deficiencies means he’s normally off school Wednesday to recover. Additionally he ‘can do all that rapping and stuff’. ‘Stuff’ being blowing raspberries into his hand and making steam train noises, which he thinks is beatboxing. He is likely to talk like Tim Westwood (but a couple of octaves higher) and make pistol shooting gestures while calling people ‘Man’ and ‘Bro’, including his mum.

    You may see him in public, around his plump neck a pearl necklace (the mind boggles for those of you who associate that term elsewhere – although, whilst he sports a first-rate set of man boobs, he’s unlikely to be a choirboy). Probably he’s ‘flossing’ with his mates, recording it on his phone while making ‘hand hearts’ to each other and innocent passers by. His Nan will think this is awesome, everyone else will wanly smile with pity and wonder whether he has his own dealer yet.

    Don’t these people have specific descriptors, like the Japanese have Chigyu for certain nerdy people? They’re not that rare.


    Banter – Term made popular by thick people, describing a substitute for wit and humour.

    Much beloved by children of primary school age, footballers and people from reality TV (in order of potential intellect).

    This ‘comedic’ concept enables stupid people to insult or be rude to others without comeback. All that is needed, post abuse, is to move the body slightly to the rear whilst raising the palms towards the affronted person whilst uttering the hackneyed phrase – ‘Just a bit of Banter. No offence, Mate!‘ Sickly grin is optional but usually worthless.

    It must be kept in mind that often this individual will be the only person amused by their own comments. The fact that nobody else thinks they’re funny usually escapes them. They are stretched to understand what goes on in their own head, let alone anyone else’s. There is no known cure.


    Well, I hope I’ve made some room for something worthwhile. Stylish with gravitas, and great literary impact. Ahh.. tis’ but a dream…

    Image and Article Copyright © 2026 by L.C McCarthy

    This is a work of fiction.

  • Stopping off at the ‘Pego and Puppet’ for a quick pint of ‘Monk’s Harvest Fumble’, I sat outside to enjoy the sunshine and make sure of my facts when it came to moaning about the hot weather, now it’s become a national whinge, courtesy of non stop media carpet bombing. Not as much as Brexit but just as tedious.

    The state of my dungarees meant, rather than incite a raft of questions based around ‘did I know what a washing machine was?’ or ‘are you single?’, outside was the best option. I’d not washed them on purpose. Clean fresh dungarees might lead people to believe I was a children’s entertainer which, for many, is a very small step away from ‘kiddie fiddler’. Bouncy, high octane, brightly coloured people bending balloons while waving and gurning at innocent bystanders is clearly quite suspicious.

    It was mostly fresh muck and grease, gained from rolling around under Tracey, my mate Eddie’s most treasured possession, a 1989 Alpha Romeo GTV6. It was also his wife’s name, ensuring he sidestepped any minefields. This often backfired, but not the car or his wife, allegedly.

    A revving engine caught my attention and, with a cloud of long blond hair billowing out of the sunroof, a small blue van pulled into the pub car park not twenty feet from where I sat.

    It was Laura ‘the Sandwich’, a 40 year old-ish lady who put some long hours into her little business. She liked the lads company and was well liked in return: we all often socialised together, apart from Yorkshireman Dick Whatmough, whom she clearly despised. Questionable innuendo was, ironically, not appreciated.

    Laura got out of her van and, clearly pissed off, waved, went inside to reappear minutes later with a very large G & T. She sat down opposite me, and necked about six quid’s worth in one go.

    ‘I’ll be walking home,’ she said, reflectively. ‘Fucking arseholes!’ This had more venom attached, all the more startling coming from such a pretty face.

    ‘Who’s that, Laura?’

    ‘That TV crew down by the river. Filming a scene for a crime drama.’

    ‘You down there flogging sandwiches?’ I inquired.

    ‘Oh no, better than that! The production people came into my shop last week and asked me to do some catering. All very well if a certain arse of a Prima Donna wasn’t being a twat, stopping filming and ruining all the food.’

    ‘Shit, what did she do?’

    ‘It was a he! One of those left wing luvvies with loads of money, full of self importance and media adulation: always finds time to condescend to tell those less well off how to spend their hard earned cash, and what to think!’ She seethed. ‘There’s about twenty of those innocents, aka ‘the crew’, down there now getting fucked over by the idiot.’

    ‘Wow, he’s pissed you off! Was he a Hobbit?’

    ‘What?’ Laura looked puzzled. I shook my head and smiled, and she continued. ‘So after a bit I started chatting to a really nice lady, I think she was in a recent Netflix period drama, the sort of thing the BBC used to do well, but have now got too lost with virtue signalling and rewriting history.’

    ‘I’m guessing she wasn’t pleased with wasting her time?’

    ‘No – she used lots of words that wouldn’t make it pre watershed. She made me laugh though, especially when she showed me this email on her phone. I got her to send it across to me.’ Laughing, Laura handed her phone across.

    This is what I read….


    All Agents/Celebrities currently contemplating an appearance on the show ‘What do we think they are?’ – a slightly tweaked format to accommodate any current gender confusion – should be aware of the following, (a points system is in place).

    You will need to;

    1. Have some background involving the slave trade, preferably not Barbados or Jamaica as the production team fancy somewhere new, St Lucia or Antigua would be good. Any French connection such as Martinique would be very popular. If you are white any involvement in this area, even as indentured workers, would be a non starter. It’s not for white people so you won’t be acceptable.

    2. Have a link into social and industrial hardship in the early 19th to early 20th century. Anecdotes about ‘tut’ mill owner and walking 10 miles in hobnailed clogs for a bread and sawdust roll, or similar, are desirable, the more unbelievable the better – remember ‘4 Yorkshiremen’? Banging on about ‘class‘ – a concept that gained traction in the early 20th century but now is puzzling and meaningless to most in the modern world – is a prerequisite (please bring own cloth cap). Any connections to crumpled, daft, left wing politicians; Michael Foot, Tony Benn, Ken Clarke etc, will be vigorously exploited.

    3. Show how ‘Votes for Women’ impacted positively on your family history. Suffragette plots to murder men of high status resonate well with some ‘wimmin’ in the production team, as do risqué stories of getting trapped in closets – usually with only rugs to munch on – in Parliament after lights out. Prostitutes from Whitechapel are not suffragettes, although potential ‘Jack the Ripper’ angles will be considered as they appeal to the masses. Any opportunity to slip the word ‘patriarchy’ into the narrative multiple times will not be overlooked.

    4. If an ancestor was a member of any single gender organisation or society, perhaps a men’s sports team or scientific body, or a ladies knitting club or amateur theatre group, let us know. We will strongly suggest (make it a ‘fact’!) that they were obviously members of a massive covert LGBT+ network that was part of British society for centuries, and was forcibly suppressed by a very small minority of individuals, who were actually all gay themselves, but were too scared to show their own true rainbow of colours.

    5. Be related to someone who participated in the First World War. Preferably some poor working class boy who was blown to pieces on the Somme with all his pals (we can probably crowbar in ‘exploited by the ruling class’). Died in a mustard gas attack is also going to score highly. If additionally a female relative worked in a munitions factory (being blown to pieces is also good here) then that will practically ensure the appearance money will be heading to your bank account soonest.

    6. Evidence activity involving the ‘Blitz spirit’ during WW2. Contributing to the war effort despite ‘sanctioned‘ racial obstructions is a big points scorer.  Also good are harrowing experiences in concentration camps with low survival rates. ‘Tenko’ type Japanese ones are good right now as we’re trying to avoid the Jewish question. Upsets the Pro Palestinians.

    7. Our focus is very much on the alluring unholy trinity of Racism, Misogyny and Homophobia. Highlighting negative social and cultural environments involving people from the past is very much our bread and butter. The programme prides itself on irreverently ‘outing’ people from historical periods who we feel weren’t showing proper liberal 21st century values, (existing 2 or 3 centuries in the past isn’t an excuse, and pointing out how stupid they were, and how clever we are is an easy win), plus we will be really miffed if we’ve missed an opportunity to bang our drum, however irrelevant. We feel it shows how much we’ve drawn attention to bias, bigotry, and misinformation in journalism. No more making up stories, fabricating evidence or lying is our (new?) clarion call. We will just deny such charges anyway, even when confronted with irrefutable evidence – or failing that, we’ll pretend we can’t hear and ignore everyone.

    Addendum

    ‘Celebrity Fixit Shop’ is due for transmission in the New Year. The second series is already being outlined. The above criteria apply here. It goes without saying that items brought in, along with the back-story will not be checked for veracity. A don’t ask, won’t tell policy is in place. Clearly this is entertainment, therefore the truth can go on the back burner, and eventually be removed from the hob entirely if required. Good TV relies on imagination, and the odd fib here and there.  We request that expenses for any acquired item are not submitted to us as the ‘institutionalised cash handout’ cannot be utilised in such circumstances. That money is needed for our Ideological personal projects, (such as 2019’s bomb ‘A Christmas Carol’), and the Trump court case. Put it on your own tax return.


    I laughed. ‘Always suspected they liked to paint a particular picture.’ Getting up I looked down at her. ‘Another large one for you? Might as well, I’m walking home too, so I’ll be having a pint.’

    ‘Thanks, I think I will,’ she laughed back.

    ‘I can also drop you back in the morning for your van.’

    ‘That’ll be lovely,’ smiled Laura.

    Image and Article Copyright © 2026 by L.C McCarthy

    This is a work of fiction.

  • .

    Define Weapon?

    There I was sat in the ‘Sack and Puppy’, sipping a pint of Witches Nipple, perusing an online discussion pondering the likelihood of the BBC making a programme showcasing Lucy Worsley’s extensive Coat, Handbag and Shoe collection. Advantageously filmed by midgets 18 inches from the floor in order to get, I’m assuming, all the accoutrements in the same frame. Out of focus shots mandatory.

    The attentive followers had adjourned to look at her iplayer back catalogue, and 24hrs later had come back to report there was absolutely no need – there was already enough material to make half a dozen hour long specials. There were also suggestions that a refocus onto apolitical historical content might be nice.

    Three blokes came in, bought pints and sat down at the table next to me. One cocked his head to listen to the background music. It was Pat Benatar’s  ‘Stop Using Sex as a Weapon’.

    The resultant conversation went something like this, with names clarified along the way;

    Chubbs:  Did your other half use sex as a weapon, Munty?

    Munty: I doubt it. Breech loading was a non starter and muzzle loading too far back in the past….

    Chubbs: Sounds like a ‘no’ then. What did the other-half favour as the weapon of choice?

    Munty: Some kind of household implement I’d guess, Chubbs.

    Boz: What? Like a toaster? Smoke, the smell of burning and alarms waking the whole house up screams weaponisation to me.

    Munty: Something traditional perhaps? Rolling pin?

    Boz: Fag in the corner of her mouth and rollers in her hair? Fucking Hell Munty, 1960’s tabloid comic strip! Anyway a rolling pin is rarer and less visible than an Iranian General. How much pastry rolling happens these days?

    Munty: I suppose the other traditional item, the frying pan is also out then: maybe I’ve been single too long. I’m not sure where the rolling pin and frying pan stuff came from. I don’t remember any vicious gory stories involving a wife going ballistic and taking out half a dozen blokes. Going Sutcliffe with a sauté pan doesn’t ring any bells.

    Boz: You’d have seen it on one of those true crime programmes by now. There’s enough of them to have explored every case there’s ever been ten times over. Same sort of TV people have been through every Marvel comic ever published looking for an unexploited character. Surprised we haven’t seen ‘Copyright Man’ yet.

    Munty: Maybe one of those 6 inch high, glossy gold china word things. You know them? They spell ‘LOVE’ or ‘HOME’ and such like. There were puffy wall sticker versions too, as if you’d forget it was your house and need a reminder. They’d hurt broken on your noggin! (He described the ‘things’ shape and size with his hands as he spoke).

    Chubbs: Sounds good. Less of that kind of tat in the world is a step forward. I endured that shit during the horrific crushed silver velour period. My attic is a timeline of tat.  But any heavy ornament would fit that outcome. I was thinking of specific universal things that they’d all use.

    Boz: Do you mean the power of speech?

    Chubbs: No, that’s why Mother Nature invented wireless headphones.  You’re both missing the most obvious weapon, one that has endured and evolved over decades.

    Munty: Are we back on Aunty Pat’s doorstep once more? Full circle? (He pointed upward indicating it was the musical ‘sex’ question originally posed)

    Chubb: Nope. More modern than that. (He paused for effect) I’m talking about the Hoover, or I should say vacuum cleaner.

    Boz: You fucking what? I’m not missing a trick here? You do mean the carpet cleaning thing?

    Munty: It’s not a euphemism only you know? One you’ve just made up?


    Extract from Manual (DFM)…
    *For all those pedants who can’t wait to get their anoraks off and get smug with ‘Apparati’ – Check first! I’m correct.

    Chubb: Nope. That’s exactly what I’m talking about. Think about it. It comes in sizes from small hand held to heavy duty industrial and some barely man portable. Now cordless and very mobile. They obviously have motors designed to hit that frequency level where invasive meets irritating, meets anti social. Wireless headphones are not a defence..

    Munty: Hmm… that kind of utility and effectiveness sounds like a weapon…

    Chubb: What else can bang into doors and walls with such reckless abandon? And after maximum annoyance, as intensity is ramped up until a reaction is forthcoming, objections are robustly defended with the classic  ‘well, somebody has to clean up around here…. – I’m not going to live in a pigsty… – you’re clearly not going to do it…’  et cetera.. Huffing and puffing clearly implied.

    Boz: Now you mention it my mum used her Hoover like some kind of emotional venting system. Saturday morning was a fucking nightmare, especially when you’d only been in bed 4 hours, and were metabolising a dozen pints.. I always wondered how after 30 years of vacuum ‘driving’ she could smash into quite as much of the house as she did. Like Ben Hur’s fucking chariot!

    Chubb: Be aware that the vacuum’s rubber bumpers aren’t to protect the furniture. They’re to increase weapon capability. The rollers and suchlike underneath intensify the noise, and are there to intimidate, a bit like the sound of grinding tank tracks puts the shits up your average trench bound squaddie.

    Munty: My sister’s got a Kirby. It’s the Leopard 2 of the vacuum world. Metal bodied with a separate drive motor. She doesn’t have to go around the house, just hoovers upstairs and the whole floor vibrates. You’d think a sinkhole was opening up below.

    Chubb: The vacuum’s won anti-social, and passive-agressive, household appliance of the year awards 38 times in a row. The hairdryer didn’t stand a chance, and that’s consistently come second. That’s invasive, makes the telly unwatchable but most have a cable and malevolently drying your hair all over the house is difficult to justify. The vacuum is ‘access all areas’ and impossible to counter unless you like being called lazy and dirty, and immediately losing the moral high ground.

    Boz: But I’m not complaining about the cleaning stuff – it’s the timing. I complained once and got, ‘I don’t care if it is the World Cup Final, and its only once every four years, I’m not living in squalor’. Thing is the week before I’d got the drill out – after work, to put the shelf up she’d asked for – and I got a gob full.  ‘Coronation Street’ took priority – and it was a repeat!

    Munty: Yeh! Now I think about it was my ex’s catalyst for ‘teddies out the pram’ on more than one occasion.  It’s some kind of proxy weapon. Less about dusty, more about a platform for opening hostilities.

    Chubb: Dirty tricks and a dust up! Ha-ha! Told you it was a weapon.

    Boz:  Crikey, we’ll be sending Mr Dyson to the Hague on war crimes charges next! What’s the solution?

    Chubb: Do some hoovering using the same reasoning as inflicted on you. I was told it wasn’t up to scratch, and it got re-done.  I claimed I was trying my best and just wanted to help out. Advantage Chubb. I also popped the fuse out on certain days, but don’t kick the arse out of that one. I was asked nicely not to ‘help out’ during her programmes, and I was given the same return deal. Doesn’t solve the proxy weap ……

    At this point two women came into the pub, weighed down with shopping bags and made their way across to the three men.

    One of them, a blonde in leggings, addressed Chubb: Hey love, Me and Maria have picked up a few nice bits.

    Chubb:  Sounds nice, Kath.  (His face did not match his words – without even knowing what she’d bought – and he was clearly working out how much room he had in the attic.)

    Maria (looking at Boz): I won’t show you here, but I’ve bought some lovely ornaments, and they’re really on trend right now!

    Boz grinned, although it looked more a grimace of pain, and nodded. (‘On trend’ has that effect on many people.)

    Kath:  And we’ve been looking* at new hoovers, Maria fancies a new one, and I know ours has been playing up, so you won’t have to fiddle about fixing it anymore, Dave (Chubb).

    From where I sat I felt the lads in question die a little inside.

    Munty (laughing): Hey Guys, Upgrades!

    (* Girltalk for – I’ve picked my favourite, ordered it, paid up and it’ll be here a week on Monday.)

    Images (bar those in the public domain) and Article Copyright © 2026 by L.C McCarthy

    This is a work of fiction.

  • I was in the pub (for a change?) getting outside a pint of ‘Tarts Temple’ when I clocked ‘Circular’ Chris at the bar. He was showing off his suntan, which was more like an intense crimson with his pale skin and Titian locks. You’ll probably find the shade on one of the paint companies colour charts under Scottish Tan.

    He got his name, not from his body shape, or even when he worked for the post office, but from his head. I suppose ‘Moony’ or something planetary related would have fitted and he was called ‘Tefal’ -i.e. a frying pan – for a while, but they’re also known for other kitchen stuff, and it just wasn’t right. Panface was suggested but it didn’t alliterate, which is very desirable in British humour, and was far too direct. That kind of comedy is best left to the Germans.

    ‘Alright Circy (Surky), been on holiday?’

    Turned out he’d been to the Maldives, all inclusive with his other half.

    ‘Yeh, Saved up a hod of money this year. Sally hasn’t spent much either, so as a reward….’

    ‘You’ve been out and about though? I’ve seen you and Sal in here loads of times.’

    ‘Ah. Got your phone handy? I’ll show you why.’ Pulling his own phone out he sent me the email he’d sent to Evri….

    ‘So Circy , they won’t deliver to you?

    ‘I get made up delivery attempt emails but that’s just mugging their system off.’

    ‘It pisses you off though?’

    ‘No,’ he laughed. ‘Thing is I can still get whatever I want as other companies are actually exploiting the situation. So I ordered something the other day, and under the ‘special delivery’ and ‘express courier’ free options, which are secret codenames for Evri – which also tells a story, mugging people off, although only one time, hopefully – was a DPD option for a couple of quid extra. Well worth it, no worries, no gamble whether it comes or not, proper updates rather than half-assed disappearing trails, and above all respect for the customer.’

    ‘Bit pointless though, sending that letter. Their customer service, and I use that term very loosely, will just dismiss you’

    ‘Yep, Of course they will. But it made me laugh. Fancy a pint?’

    Images (bar those in the public domain) and Article Copyright © 2026 by L.C McCarthy

    This is a work of fiction.

  • I was mulling over what the cast would have been if my novel Dmitry’s Gift had been turned into a ‘Carry On’. For the 8 and a half people who have read it (one person claims to, but I’m doubtful) it’ll perhaps be more thought provoking than for those who haven’t – who will be doubtless saying ‘WTF are you going on about?’

                                                      Carry On Dmitry

    Sasha – Jim Dale

    Dmitry – Leslie Philips

    Buralov – Terry Scott

    Kurilov – Peter Gilmore

    Andrei – Jon Pertwee

    Mischa – Bernard Bresslaw

    Kochansky – Charles Hawtrey

    Lev – Kenneth Connor

    Boris – Jack Douglas

    Yefim – Wilfrid Brambell

    Laundress – Hattie Jacques

    Nelly – Fenella Fielding

    Malenkov – Bert Kwouk

    Auntie – Joan Sims

    Tima Chelkin – Bernard Cribbins

    Darya (Dasha) – Patsy Rowlands

    Krugyin – Kenneth Williams

    Sharapov – Peter Butterworth

    Fedor – Sid James

    Hetta – Barbara Windsor

    Simeon – Kenneth Cope

    There’s a few more characters – Sasha’s Grandad (Stanley Unwin?) for example, and as his lady love, June Whitfield – but it’s a start!

    Although I don’t watch ‘soap operas’ I’m aware of some of the cultural icons who have ‘graced the cobbles’ of Coronation Street. Ken Barlow as Kochansky: Reg and Curly would be Krugyin and Sharapov…….Maybe Rita as Auntie and Jack and Vera playing Tima and Dasha. Another thread to explore…..

    If you’d like to ponder your own suggestions you’ll need to read the book first. See what I did there?

  • On a recent sightseeing tour of a town in middle England I stopped off for a pint close to the red brick university that carries that town’s name but very little else of note – apart from a very high pass rate for Media Studies. The tavern – ‘The Frog and Pessary’ – used to be a care home for elderly ladies facilitated by a former French Statesman. This form of charity is still an ongoing tradition, apparently.

    While savouring an aromatic glass of ‘Strumpet’s Fundament’ I spied a dishevelled mumbling elderly gentleman frantically going over some papers in the corner. My immediate thought was he was gamely struggling with an enormous workload. However, spotting his University ID, I chuckled heartily and promptly dispelled such a foolish notion. Noting the stale beer smell creeping, miasma like, from his decrepit tweed jacket, pro Palestine badge and the worn soles hanging off his ancient suede shoes, I studied his bearded face expecting to identify one of the increasingly rare Corbyn acolytes. Before I could confirm or deny this he angrily tossed a balled up document onto the floor, knocked his drink back  and stomped out.

    A member of staff came by picked up the paper ball, and placed it on my table. Cheek!

     However, as it was now public property I snatched the opportunity and read it. And now I share it with you….

    Merit, like experience, is always disparaged by those who don’t have any.

    Images and Article Copyright © 2026 by L.C McCarthy

    This is a work of fiction.

  • I met a bloke, Nick, in the pub a while back – big beard, big personality, drinking gallons of beer – no, it wasn’t Brian Blessed – but he did seem familiar. Just moved here from Sweden as he didn’t care for how they utilised public money. He’s now having a rethink after viewing Scotland’s public debt and Reeves ‘vindictive clusterfuck’ (his words) of last week. He’s moving on in the New Year. He’s considering Greenland but isn’t sure who owns it.

    He sent me this – thought it was weird. Asked me what he should do. I said don’t bother. You might as well give Reeves a ‘Calculator’ for Christmas as Rachel’s own is clearly in error – What’s his name again? Tarquin? No, that’s not right…

    Clearly a lot of it is well above my pay grade. Personally, I had him down for a VR headset (great for blotting out genuine reality), or one of the Powderpuff dolls (Angela -the ginger one?). Or is it a Bratz..?

    Difficult to tell….

    Images (bar those in the public domain) and Article Copyright © 2025 by L.C McCarthy

    This is a work of fiction.

  • 04 Aug 2025

    Reflection – Those who spend all their time in their own heads rarely see what’s going on in anyone else’s.

    Christmas already -WTF!

    There was some talk today about Christmas. It was on the radio, and somebody was going on about whether it was appropriate or not – timing wise. For most people ‘not’, if those I speak to are anything to go by.

    However, there are those who, looking to shift something off the back of the Christmas vehicle, know there must be muppets out there who are already hugging themselves and bouncing around like five year olds – apologies to the normally adjusted children who are saving the histrionics until December – despite the fact that their sun tan lotion is barely dry.

    These will also be the people who buy innappropriate gifts – a pet hate of mine. These people treat the giving of gifts – don’t say ‘gifting’, I’ll probably vomit – as some kind of obligatory box ticking exercise.

    There are three categories of gift giver;

    • 1. The gift where the buyer choses something they would like while completely ignoring the person on the receiving end. It may appeal to their sense of humour, excused with practicality, like Gnome Boxers or Reindeer slippers. (How I do hate novelty gifts!). In years to come many such items – Ronco, K-Tel etc – for removing fluff fron Gran’s cardy, rebuttoning said cardy with plastic rivets or chopping up the few vegetables her pension allows her – become collectable for people who like to laugh at junk like that. Alternately they might just be cheap.
    • 2. Next comes the impressionable buyer who, while not immune from the items at 1. above, prefaces presentaion of their gift with the words ‘the sales lady in the shop said…’ or ‘they are really on trend right now’.. (another sick bag please -this one is full), or ‘my neighbour’s got one, and they have a Range Rover!..’ They often distrust themselves so much they are scared of getting it wrong, or are just pointing out, via the gift choice, how very avant guard they are. They’ll probably use that phrase as it sounds pretentious enough…..errr?
    • 3. Lastly, my favourite person. The one that actually takes an interest in you, and knows what you’re about and reflects that in your gift. That really does mean something. Perhaps noticing you spend time outdoors or reading books. Maybe you like cooking or collecting bobbleheads, things they may not like, but know the gift is not for them, but you. Friendship (not the concept peddled on Facebook), like it’s sibling ‘Love’, means not putting ‘you’ first, that’s what your real friends do. It’s not about fashion or cost, it’s about care.

    “Fashion is something barbarous, for it produces innovation without reason and imitation without benefit” – George Santayana

    In a couple of years it seems that after Easter stock is cleared from the shelves they’ll soon be filling the space with blow up santa’s and cheap jumpers with smutty Elves emblazoned across the front. You know it’s coming!


    31 Jul 2025

    Reflection – ‘Insecurity is a disease, it kills everything bar selfishness..‘.

    A little knowledge is an embarrassing thing

    I was reading some comments online recently criticising the film (I’m English) Child 44, set in 1950’s soviet russia. It’s not too bad – Gary Oldman, Tom Hardy – What’s not to like!

    Anyway, this individual was claiming it wasn’t credible because none of the ‘Uniforms’ were wearing medals at all times, because that’s what they did – on operations and in combat!

    What a plonker!

    Why? For a number of reasons;

    Photographs portraying soldiers wearing field uniforms showing off their medals are numerous. However, these are all official propaganda snaps – taken in the field. Nobody owned/used a camera. The Soviet Union was notoriously poor at providing consumer goods. A pair of shoes were like rocking horse shit, ones that didn’t fall apart even rarer. Secondly, buying food was the priority then, even if you had an option. Lastly, the Secret Police were not fans of amateur photography and it was dangerous to one’s health to go waving a camera around. The point being official ‘Courageous Peasant Soldiers’ snaps only – anything impromtu, unstaged or spontaneous was not possible.

    Soviet soldiers did not own ‘Best Uniforms’ – just ones for fighting in. The idea of supplying 70 million troops with Imperialist inspired best dress, instead of more tanks, was a non starter. Therefore to conflate field uniforms and medals as being worn together in the field is mistaken. What else were they going to hang their medals on for Pravda photos? Pyjamas! Although these were rarer than shoes.

    Perhaps more importantly this concept would be incredibly unpopular. Anyone daft enough to wear all that glittery metal in the field would be Billy No-mates. It would attract enemy fire like flies to a turd, which ironically would be what his colleagues would be calling him. It’s a complete non-starter. Nothing screws a surprise attack up like a load of blokes jangling across the battlefield lit up like a capitalist Christmas tree. What commander would condone that!

    How some people look at a few bits of ‘info’ – fail to ask common sense questions or find corroborating facts – and throw themselves into the arena, subsequently complaining that a lion bit them, astounds me. Making yourself look like a idiot, then saying you didn’t know better, only makes it worse.

    It’s ignorance in this case.


    27 Jul 2025

    Drama? – What Drama?

    Why does much of the UK drama on TV seem to consist of? ;

    • Everything shot with a grey or blue filter. No uplifting sunshine to be seen.
    • Everybody is confrontational – not just the antagonist, all the good guys too!
    • Incredibly stroppy junior staff members who can’t see the bigger picture. Very stereotypical.
    • Interdepartmental rudeness/tardy co-operation when everyone has the same goal. Really? – No!
    • Hierachy who pester and threaten top staff members beneath them. Very inspiring for juniors.
    • Public servants who are blatantly rude and beligerent toward members of the public. Rung the council lately?

    Is this really ‘Drama’? What a depressing crappy world we apparently live in. In some ways it is, but have we forgotten good stuff happens too? Talk about mental heath issues!

    These mythical scenarios only occur rarely. Ninety nine percent of professionals; Police, Fire, Health Services, Legal, Financial… etc cultivate good, happy and respectful working environments because they produce the best results for all concerned, not the dysfunctional small minded tyrannies portrayed. Obviously some upset occurs but good communication resolves it quickly. It has to, as moving forward is paramount. However, what we get is cheap and crude ‘Drama’ most of which is soon forgotten. Like a sensationalist tabloid headline. Is this the best such a large talent pool can produce?

    I can hear the gainsayers now -It’s only pretend, people know it’s not real life. Bollocks! I’ve lost count of the number of actors who have been abused online and in the street because of the character they portray on TV. There are people who emulate and stalk others as they aspire to be just like the person they portray. Numerous contestants on game shows cite the likes of ‘The Crown’ as the source of knowledge, despite the producers admitting large chunks are made up. Many online tabloids mix real life storylines with plotlines from soap operas or reality tv on the same page. Clearly many cannot tell fact from fiction, reality from pretend. Often that divide is consciously, perhaps deliberately obscured.

    I would have thought quality drama should be getting more sophisticated rather than plumbing the depths of vulgarity. There is only a finite number of plot lines, but people love a good story even if they’ve seen it many times. I know people who have watched; Zulu, Star Wars, Pride and Prejudice (BBC), Friends, assorted Dickens and many others scores of times, but still settle on the sofa with a smile on their face when a favourite pops up on screen.

    There is no substitute for a good story, credible characters/acting talent, and a well thought through and executed script.

    So, come on main channels step your game up and give us some quality drama. Don’t drag us all down – Lift us all up. We deserve it.